HUMAN RIGHTS FOR EACH PERSON REGARDLESS OF AGE, RACE, RELIGION OR POLITICS
HOME | PRISONERS & PRISONS | EXPERIENCES | BOOKS & PRODUCTS | HOW TO HELP | LATEST NEWS | EMAIL
LATEST NEWS
Hicks refused visit for fear of punishment: lawyer
The Department of Foreign Affairs says it is not aware of allegations that Guantanamo Bay detainee David Hicks has refused to meet consular officials because he believes he has been punished after previous visits.

Officials from the department had earlier told a Senate hearing that Hicks did not give any reasons when he refused to meet the Australian Consul-General at Guantanamo Bay in September.

The hearing has now been told that Hicks's US military lawyer, Major Michael Mori, says his client believes he has been punished after making complaints during previous consular visits.

The department's first assistant secretary, Rod Smith, has told the hearing Maj Mori has not raised those concerns with Australian officials.

"It would be a matter of very great concern to us if Australians in detention overseas were punished for simply drawing to the attention of consular officials concerns that [they] have about the conditions of their detention," Mr Smith said.

The hearing was told the current charges against Mr Hicks have lapsed and the regulations governing the new military commissions will come into force in January.

Queensland Labor Senator John Hogg has questioned why a firm date cannot be given for new charges to be laid.

"Well, it's not very reassuring for Mr Hicks to be incarcerated and have no prospect as to when he might be charged under this new regime," Senator Hogg said.

"Surely the American authorities can be pressed to give some indication as to when charges might be laid."

A senior legal adviser with the Department of Foreign Affairs, Penny Richards, told the hearing US officials have been urged to lay new charges against Hicks as quickly as possible.

"The Government does remain very concerned about ongoing delay and has made numerous representations to the US about these concerns," Ms Richards said.

Hicks 'abandoned' by Australia
1.11.2006.
Amnesty International has accused the Australian government of abandoning terror suspect David Hicks and doing nothing to ensure sure he gets a fair trial.


Amnesty secretary general Irene Khan last week wrote an open letter to Prime Minister John Howard as part of its campaign to have Hicks released from Guantanamo Bay in Cuba, where he has been held for five years.

Adelaide-born Hicks, 31, has been detained by the US since his capture among Taliban forces in Afghanistan in December 2001.

He had previously pleaded not guilty to charges of attempted murder, aiding the enemy and conspiracy, and was earmarked to appear before a US military commission.

The charges were struck out when the US Supreme Court in June ruled it was unlawful for the commission to try Hicks and other
Guantanamo Bay detainees.

But US President George W Bush has since signed controversial new legislation into law allowing revamped military commissions to proceed.

Symbol of injustice
Ms Khan said Amnesty was concentrating on the Hicks' case because it had become a symbol of injustice and the impunity which the US military prison had come to represent.

"He's not one man ... (he's a) symbol of injustice and the impunity and non-accountability that Guantanamo has come to represent," she told ABC radio.

"We are picking him because he has been now in Guantanamo for almost five years without being tried. He's not likely to get a fair trial in the US, which has just adopted a new law."

Hicks 'abandoned'
Ms Khan accused the Australian government of behaving outrageously in the Hicks' case.

"They have basically abandoned him. They have not taken any effort to ensure that he gets a fair trial," she said.

"They approved trial by military commission, which the US
Supreme Court has said violates American law as well as international law.

"So he should come home, he should get justice here in
Australia. Give him a fair go at Australian justice."

'Depressed and disorientated'

US military lawyer Major Michael Mori says Hicks is depressed and disorientated after being left in solitary confinement in Guantanamo Bay for seven months with the lights on 24 hours a day.

Major Mori confirmed his client has been confined to the one concrete room for about 22 hours of every day for the last seven months.

The military lawyer is in Australia to seek a meeting with Attorney-General Philip Ruddock and to conduct a cross-party briefing of federal MPs.

He also suggested Hicks had been subject to sleep deprivation, an action defined as coercion rather than torture by Mr Ruddock.

"There was no valid reason given why he was placed in solitary."

Asked if Hicks was close to breaking, Mori said he hoped the former jackaroo was not.

"We're doing everything we can. We try to get down there as quickly as possible and try to get books through for him, but it does take some time."

But the reality, Major Mori said, was that Hicks was in a terrible mental state.

"I went down and spent my birthday with him at the beginning of
October," Major Mori said.

"I see the changes in him, a sense of depression (and) I think that's what they're probably shooting for: they want to break him, they don't want him to resist."

Major Mori said a possible explanation for the solitary confinement could be that Hicks had complained.

"The day before he was put in solitary, he met with Australian consular (officials) and complained, things that were happening to him and also what he had seen. The next day, he was put in solitary confinement."

Hicks, Major Mori said, was now refusing to meet with consular officials.

"They (guards at Guantanamo Bay) have trained him that if he doesn't talk, if he doesn't complain then he doesn't get punished."

Hicks trying appeals court
November 01, 2006 Article from: The Associated Press

LAWYERS for dozens of Guantanamo Bay detainees have asked a US appeals court to declare a key part of George Bush's new military tribunal law unconstitutional.

In written arguments filed with the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, the lawyers (including ones for David Hicks) challenged the military's authority to arrest people overseas and detain them indefinitely without allowing them access to US courts to contest their detention.

Mr Bush gave the military that authority earlier this month when he signed a new law that sets up military commissions to hold trials for foreigners designated as "enemy combatants."

Mr Bush hailed the law as a crucial tool in the war on terrorism and said it would allow prosecution of several high-level terror suspects.

Lawyers for more than 100 detainees who will be locked out of the court system under the new law asked the appeals court to let them keep their legal challenge going in civilian courts.

They said the framers of the US Constitution never would have permitted the government to hold people indefinitely without charging them.

"Persons imprisoned without charge must retain the right to obtain a court inquiry into the factual and legal bases for their imprisonment," lawyers wrote.

This argument echoes a Supreme Court ruling in June, when justices declared that the Bush administration's system of trying enemy combatants violated US and international law.

Within weeks, the president convinced Congress to pass a new law setting up military commissions and barring detainees from using the civilian court system.

Shortly after the new military commissions law was signed, the Justice Department told hundreds of detainees that their cases in the US courts had been rendered moot.

Seven retired federal judges from both the Republican and Democratic parties filed the legal briefs in the detainees case before the Washington appeals court, arguing that the military commissions law would allow authorities to use evidence obtained by torture.

Although the law prohibits torture, the judges said the military has not addressed torture claims made by detainees. The judges also argued that the new law illegally strips courts of the power to question military decisions about the detainees' torture claims.

The Justice Department has until November 13 to respond to the detainees claims.

Adelaide-born Hicks has been held in Guantanamo Bay since soon after he was captured with Taliban forces in Afghanistan in late 2001.

US authorities charged him with conspiracy to commit war crimes and attempted murder by an unprivileged belligerent and aiding the enemy, but the charges were dropped after the Supreme Court ruling.

 

CLICK HERE TO RETURN TO THE NEWS PAGE
FREEDOM IS A RIGHT OF ALL HUMAN BEINGS IN A WORLD WHERE LIFE IS VALUED AND PEACE MAY FINALLY BE A POSSIBILITY
*
MAKE A DONATION
*
TELL A FRIEND
*
HOME | PRISONERS & PRISONS | EXPERIENCES | BOOKS & PRODUCTS | HOW TO HELP | LATEST NEWS | EMAIL
Just in case you forgot - read the Universal declaration of Human Rights
Copyright - An important message to website owners:
All information at this site is © Copyright 1996 - 2006 'Save-A-Life' & 'Foreign Prisoner Support Service' unless stated otherwise. As with all our information AND more specifically, information relating to CAMPAIGNS AND/OR PRISONERS we have been granted special permission to disclose this type of information by the families and/or by the detainee themselves. Therefore, if you wish to use any of this information to re-create in your own website or elsewhere, please contact us - save breach of copyright. News stories are reprinted for archival, news reporting and information use only and are credit where possible.
Click here for the legal stuff